Welcome to HackLawyer.net

Two recent events marked a resurrection of the debate surrounding that one ultimate act of war - the dropping of the A-bomb over Hiroshima.  First, Tsutomu Yamaguchi died three weeks ago at the age of 93.  He was a rarity among his fellow Japanese.  He not only survived the Hiroshima blast but lived to tell his story after emerging alive when Nagasaki was bombed just days later.  In fact, he was one of what is to believed 165 people who survived both bombings.  These individuals were transferred to Nagasaki after the Hiroshima bomb run to remove them from harm’s way.  Their and Mr. Yamaguchi’s stories make up a good portion of a new book just published which describes in gut-wrenching detail the actual effects of experiencing the atomic bomb blast and its deadly after-effects.  The book, “The Last Train From Hiroshima,” by Charles Pellegrino is sure to jumpstart the moral debate which continues to swirl around President Truman’s decision to drop the bomb.  We’ll get to that in a moment but it’s worth considering Pellegrino’s findings and observations, based on detailed interviews with survivors and the various official histories documented by both the American and Japanese military forces.

Pellegrino found out from survivors that those who lived to tell their tale did so because they were the recipients of blind, random good fortune.  It wasn’t God’s will or divine intervention.  They were in the right place at the right time, sheltered from the searing heat produced by the blast and afterward, from the deadly gamma and infrared rays.  Because of their position, usually behind sound physical structures, they were protected from the flattening effects of the explosion.  But what these survivors witnessed after the debacle defies mere description.  For example, they immediately noticed something very disturbing about those who were exposed to the heat and flash of the explosion wearing brightly colored clothes  with designs.  The heat of the blast permanently branded the clothing designs into their skin.  Those who were wearing any kind of metal, say like a wristwatch, died much quicker than other survivors.  The reason?  When the heat hit, it was so intense that it literally melted the metal into the skin of the person.  This exposed the person to enhanced doses of radiation since the metal acted like a superconductor.  These unfortunate folks died of radiation sickness very, very quickly.  Many people reported that the smell of burning human flesh, quite prevalent over all of Hiroshima, was “quite similar to the scent of squid when it was grilled over hot coals with a few pieces of sweet pork thrown alongside.”  But that is nothing like what Pellegrino describes what the Japanese called “atomic bomb disease.”  (more…)

You may recall Hack filed his own “Findings and Conclusions” on the Keller controversy back on August 21, 2009.  Now that Special Master David Berchelmann, Jr. has filed his Findings of Fact, all I have to say is Hack is vindicated.  And to all of those who fell for the blandishments of Texas Defender Service (including a lot of high-profile lawyers with the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association), reading the findings will be particularly painful.

“Friends may come and go but enemies accumulate.” - Thomas Jones

It’s still illegal to walk on the wrong side of the street in any town in Texas and if observed by a police officer, provides probable cause to detain, question and possibly search.  That’s the conclusion of the Amarillo Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion which reverses a Lubbock County trial judge’s order of suppression.  In addition, the Waco Court of Appeals hands down a reversal based on “unassigned error” (the last vestige of what the old yellow-pad lawyers used to call “fundamental error”) involving the requirements for a properly amended indictment.  It’s worth reading.  Go to Significant Decisions page.

Friday, January 15th, was not a good day for me.  For that matter, it probably wasn’t a very good day for anyone who has to live by their wits, meaning they work for themselves.  The 15th of January simply means that it’s tax quarterly day.  That last quarterly for 2009 was due.  It always hurts but it was especially painful this time around.  Not only did I have that chit to pay but I got the notice from my insurance carrier on the same day that my next quarterly payment on my catastrophic health care policy was due in another fifteen days.  And I still owe the bank money.  I’ve been going through twenty-nine years of this; I don’t know how much longer I really want to. 

I do know one thing: in that long process, I have been voluntarily transferring what little wealth I accumulated to three entities: the government, the banks and insurance companies.  I can’t keep going on like this.  I’m sure my fellow solo practitioners feel the same and if not, then 1) you don’t give a damn about making the quarterly payments (can’t blame you) and 2) you either don’t bother with individual health coverage or lucky you, your spouse is a wage earner with group coverage. 

Blackie Sherrod once said, “It’s not the income, it’s the outgo.”  How true.  What do I do in the face of yet another increase on my quarterly premium on the health coverage?  Do I kick it up to a 10K deductible?  Do I go even higher, essentially becoming self-insured?  Yet one three or four-day stay in the hospital will break anyone.  Seen the bills for short stays in the hospital lately?  They are mind-boggling.  We can’t keep going on like this.  We really can’t.  I don’t want to bludgeon readers with tired saws but this is not a situation where we have a date in the near future with a reckoning.  It’s here, it’s now and people are going bust, simply because the take from this unholy troika is unbearable.  It’s enough to turn one to a life of crime or at least, the black economy.  (more…)

Consider this: no sooner had the New York Yankees won the World Series, it parted ways with the series MVP Hideki Matsui.  In the minds of Yankee management, he was no longer worth the millions, regardless of his stats.  They dropped him even before the cheering stopped.  Multibillionaire Sam Zell purchased the Tribune Company for God knows how much.  But when the economy turned south, he elected to place the storied company in bankruptcy, without hesitation.  It is a common occurrence that owners of companies that default on their bonds would rather let the concern fail rather than invest more capital into the venture.  In all three situations, economists term the action taken as “strategic default.”  Banks follow suit when they issue new credit cards to people who have already failed to stay current on the old ones.  So why do the Mortgage Bankers Association and President Obama chide individual homeowners who default on their mortgages?  Why does the banking industry talk about the “message” that defaulting homeowners “send to their family and their kids and their friends,” arguing that we have a ongoing responsibility to make good on the loan, even when it is most definitely not in the long-term interest to continue to shovel good money after bad?

Just recently, Morgan Stanley decided to stop making payments on five San Francisco office buildings.  It had purchased the commercial real estate at the height of the boom, only to watch the values plummet after the 2008 crash.  No one - not former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Jr., not President Obama, nor any other Wall Street banker - ever accused Morgan Stanley of unethical behavior for letting the property go.  In fact, no one ever thought that such behavior was unethical or immoral in the first place.  But the average American is cut from a different cloth, I guess.  He or she is supposed to honor all debts, even one where there is absolutely no hope of ever realizing a recovery of equity.  What gives? (more…)

There was a shootout at the Las Vegas Federal Courthouse this morning.  The New York Times reports that the gunman, wielding a shotgun, killed one security guard and injured another before being shot in the head and killed by another federal agent.  At the time of the shooting, a bystander happened to be walking outside the courthouse and recorded the gunfire as it erupted.  I lost count but I think there were somewhere between 50 to 60 rounds fired.  The author comments that it’s “a hell of a morning for jury duty.”  Watch and listen to it here.

I had planned on tying it up with a pretty pink ribbon and walking away from the blog today.  After three years of planning and use, some 1400 posts and over 800,000 hits, maybe the site had run its course, meaning maybe I had run my course with this thing of mine.  However, I have to say that enough of you have encouraged me not to drop the site (with a proviso that I slow down a tad) to persuade me that a new approach is needed.  I tell you what I’ll do.  I’ll churn out select pieces, judiciously posted.  In addition, I’ll continue the Significant Decisions page, if only to make me read the opinions carefully and then analyze the holdings.  Finally, I’ll keep up with the obits that merit attention.  Perhaps taking a more measured pace will ensure quality and topicality.  Let’s hope so.  Happy New Year.  Welcome to the modified Hacklawyer.net.